Archive for May, 2010
Detecting invalid and zero temporal values
I’ve been thinking a lot about invalid and zero temporal values and how to detect them with MySQL date and time functions because mk-table-checksum has to handle “everything” correctly and efficiently. The requirements are complex because we have to take into account what MySQL allows to be stored verses what it allows to be used in certain operations and functions, how it sorts a mix of real and invalid temporal values for MIN() and MAX(), how to detect a temporal value as equivalent to zero, and how different MySQL versions might affect any of the aforementioned.
At base, the four guiding requirements are:
- Detect and discard invalid time, date, and datetime values
- Detect zero-equivalent temporal values
- Do #1 and #2 using only MySQL functions
- Work in MySQL 4.0 and newer
My tests cases for invalid temporal values are:
00:00:6000:60:00999-00-00999-01-010000-00-002009-00-002009-13-00999-00-00 00:00:00999-01-01 00:00:000000-00-00 00:00:001000-00-00 00:00:002009-00-00 00:00:002009-13-00 00:00:002009-05-26 00:00:602009-05-26 00:60:002009-05-26 24:00:00
And my test cases for first real temporal values are:
00:00:0000:00:011000-01-012009-01-011000-01-01 00:00:002009-01-01 00:00:00
And there is only one real zero-equivalent temporal value: 00:00:00.
So the first requirement is to find a MySQL function that returns NULL for all those invalid values, and that function is TO_DAYS with one exception:
mysql> SELECT TO_DAYS('999-01-01 00:00:00');
+-------------------------------+
| TO_DAYS('999-01-01 00:00:00') |
+-------------------------------+
| 364878 |
+-------------------------------+
That date is only valid if years before 1000 are handled but the MySQL manual says that,
TO_DAYS() is not intended for use with values that precede the advent of the Gregorian calendar (1582)
so we’re already way past the limit of its intended use and, moreover, the supported lower limit of a date or datetime is 1000-01-01, so says the manual. It’s reasonable to not bother with pre-year 1000 dates so I’ll overlook this.
Excepting pre-year 1000 dates, TO_DAYS() returns NULL for all the invalid values. By contrast, UNIX_TIMESTAMP() returns zero for all the invalid values and TIME_TO_SEC() returns a mix of NULL, zero, and values. So the apparent winner for requirement #1 is TO_DAYS(), but…
Requirement #2 complicates the issue because the time 00:00:00 is valid and zero-equivalent but TO_DAYS() returns NULL for it. We need a hack that handles all the cases, and here it is:
SELECT IF(TIME_FORMAT(?,'%H:%i:%s')=?, TIME_TO_SEC(?), TO_DAYS(?))
That says, basically: if the value is a time then evaluate it with TIME_TO_SEC(), else evaluate it with TO_DAYS(). It works so well in fact that it satisfies all four requirements. 00:00:00 evaluates to zero, all the invalid values evaluate to NULL, and all the valid values evaluate to various non-null values. I have to use TIME_FORMAT() instead of just TIME() because TIME() wasn’t introduced until MySQL v4.1 (fourth requirement).
The hack works because of this (substituting TIME() for TIME_FORMAT()):
mysql> SELECT TIME('00:00:00');
+------------------+
| TIME('00:00:00') |
+------------------+
| 00:00:00 |
+------------------+
mysql> SELECT TIME('00-00-00');
+------------------+
| TIME('00-00-00') |
+------------------+
| 00:00:00 |
+------------------+
mysql> SELECT TIME('2010-05-26');
+--------------------+
| TIME('2010-05-26') |
+--------------------+
| 00:20:10 |
+--------------------+
mysql> SELECT TIME('2010-05-26 10:10:10');
+-----------------------------+
| TIME('2010-05-26 10:10:10') |
+-----------------------------+
| 10:10:10 |
+-----------------------------+
As you can see, TIME() (or TIME_FORMAT()) returns the exact same value if the given value is a time, otherwise it interprets the value–which is a date or datetime–as a time causing it to return a different value than the given value. Thus we discern time values from date and datetime values and evaluate them separately with TIME_TO_SEC().
I tested on MySQL v4.0, 4.1, 5.0 and 5.1 and all pass. The only difference is 4.0 verses the others for the pre-year 1000 dates, but I’m ignoring these anyway.
Of course all the preceding could have been accomplished in code by looking at the column type and choosing the correct MySQL function to evaluate the value and check if it’s zero-equivalent, but I was curious to see if it could be done using only MySQL since, after all, it is MySQL that permits these silly, invalid temporals values.
If you know a simpler, more elegant solution that meets the four requirements and passes all the tests, please share!
Down the rabbit hole
Generally I avoid going down rabbit holes but today I decided to see how deep a particular testing rabbit hole went. This post is a third in what seems be a continuing series of programming anecdotes. It’s not particularly MySQL-related so you can stop reading here unless you grok code stuff.
Before beginning work on issue 720 I ran the mk-table-checksum test suite to make sure it was in working order. No sense writing new tests and code when the old tests and code aren’t reliable. I actually made one seemingly innocuous change to the test suite in preparation for the issue: I changed the –replicate checksum table from MyISAM to InnoDB.
Surprisingly, the test suite proved unstable. Random tests would fail at random times. Some instability was due to new tests for other issues that I wrote poorly and hadn’t been run a zillion times yet. But other instability was due to switching the checksum table to InnoDB. I knew this because I could switch it back to InnoDB and the tests were ok. Thus began my descent into the rabbit hole.
In particular the test for issue 982 was not finishing or, if it did, it took forever. I discovered that the problem had to do with –lock even though it shouldn’t since the docu says that –replicate and –lock are useless together because the former eliminates locking concerns. Obviously not. So for this I created issue 1027.
Then I turned my attention to test 207_issue_51.t for issue 51 which was opened 2 years ago and closed 1 year ago as WontFix because the problem could not be reproduced. Some might have thought it forgotten amongst the nearly 1,000 issues since its time, but it was found again at the end of this rabbit hole and revivified.
It turns out that issue 51 is, as the original reporter stated (partially), caused by –wait when (this is the part the original reporter didn’t state) the –replicate checksum table is InnoDB because –wait enables –lock which disables AutoCommit so writes to the checksum table may not be committed.
So the rabbit hole lead from issue 720 to issue 982 to issue 1027 to issue 51. Then end results will be a needed bug fix and faster, more stable tests. Sometimes it pays to follow the rabbit.
Hack MySQL tools retired, succeeded
I’m surprised, and flattered, to see that people still use, write and recommend mysqlsla, mysqlreport and–most surprisingly–mysqlsniffer. In truth, however, I consider all the original Hack MySQL tools as retired. Maatkit consumes the majority of my development time and provides better replacements for all the Hack MySQL tools. The mk tools are better because–most importantly–they’re tested, their code is more robust, and they benefit from the collected knowledge and experience of the community’s top minds (whereas the Hack MySQL tools are brain-children of only my knowledge and experience circa several years ago).
Thus I created a new tools page where I list and briefly profile free, open-source MySQL tools. As the intro paragraph states, MySQL Forge does this, too, but imho the forge is a dense jungle in which it is difficult to discern the useful bits from the less-than-useful bits. My tools page is meant to 1) inform people that the Hack MySQL tools are retired, 2) list replacements for them, and 3) give people new to the MySQL universe a quick, simple list of tools they’ll probably want to become familiar with.
Kind thanks to all who used, wrote about, contributed to and recommend the Hack MySQL tools over the years.
